Writing Down the Jones

Posts Tagged ‘logic’

Monopolies

“You think you have a monopoly on the truth.

I have  run across this phrase, and others like it, far too many times. I’d like to encourage you never to use it again. It’s the worst kind of cop out, and an inherently hypocritical statement.

Copping Out

When a person is arguing his point, but his opponent won’t relent, he’ll start arguing for the  fifth. What I mean is that he’ll say things about his opponent and opposing position that will force either an incriminating response or an invocation of the Fifth Amendment. The goal of that statement is to, first of all, put an opponent in her place, as well as point out some level of arrogance on her behalf; it has the added bonus of getting oohs from progressive audiences, most of whom are, like 13-year-old girls, thinking, “OOOOHHHH, burn!”

Read more

Brian McLaren’s Bad Logic

"How do I get elected with only one voter?"

"How can I win with just one voter?"

Some subpar reasoning from one of the prominent leaders of Emergent and progressive evangelicalism:

“I’ve only met one person in my travels in recent months who has said he is voting for McCain, and that was because he was an admittedly single-issue voter,” Mr. McLaren said. “Nearly all the vocal people I’ve met are enthusiastic about Obama. Based on the people I’m in front of as a speaker, I’d never guess the poll numbers are as close as they are.”

This is a pretty limited perspective. It would be like me saying, “I’ve only met two people in all my travels who were actually born in China.  Based on the people I talk to, I’d never guess there were a billion Chinese people walkin’ around.” Unfortunately for me, there are, in fact, a billion Chinese people.  And unfortunately for Mr. McLaren:

While national polls show Mr. McCain to be neck and neck with Mr. Obama, a survey from the authoritative Barna Group shows that Mr. McCain holds a commanding lead among evangelicals, with 61 percent to Mr. Obama’s 17 percent.

I find it hard to believe that he thinks he’s speaking in front of a representative sample of evangelicals.

Washington Times via Between Two Worlds

In Memory of Counterpoints; August 5 – August 14, 2007

barilarlingtoncemetery.jpgThe great (slight exaggeration) experiment is over. The short reason is that we couldn’t get along. It may be for the best though, because it was bound to be nothing but…well, an argument. That’s not necessarily bad, but, I’ll admit, I tend to go for the throat. Sometimes sarcastic, sometimes aggressive, always on point.

I usually enjoy the sport of it, particularly when my opponent is as aggressive and intense as I get. But alas, it was not meant to be. So, here at Power of Suggestion, I will be replacing my criticism of The God Delusion with a criticism of The Case for a Creator. Dawkins is a frustrating read for two reasons: first, he uses straw men, appeals to novelty, popularity, ridicule, and the spotlight fallacy, and that was just in the preface and first chapter.

I may at some point return to The God Delusion, if only because I can’t get my money back (and the shiny cover is attractive to my weak, religious mind). But for now it will lay on my shelf, much like to other books I’ve lost interest in. Of course, those are because I’d seen the movie already (The Illiad, The Count of Monte Cristo), this one is just bad. So, moving on.

I guess that since I’ve made a point to highlight the logical fallacies Dawkins employs in his writing, I’ll go back through my posts and make sure I haven’t done the same. Once that’s done I’ll share some insight into Jeremiah I got at church tonight, straight away.